1. Monasta L, Ronfani L, Marchetti F, Montico M, Vecchi Brumatti L, Bavcar A, et al. Burden of disease caused by otitis media: systematic review and global estimates. PloS One. 2012;7(4):e36226. PMID: 22558393 DOI.ORG/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0036226
2. Qureishi A, Lee Y, Belfield K, Birchall JP, Daniel M. Update on otitis media–prevention and treatment. Infect Drug Resist. 2014;7:15-24. PMID: 24453496 DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S39637
3. Baumann I, Gerendas B, Plinkert PK, Praetorius M. General and disease-specific quality of life in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media-a prospective study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:48. PMID: 21711571 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-48
4. Choi HG, Park KH, Park SN, Jun BC, Lee DH, Yeo SW. The appropriate medical management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in chronic suppurative otitis media. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130(1):42-6. PMID: 19424918 DOI: 10.3109/00016480902870522
5. Sharma Y, Mishra G, Patel JV. Comparative study of outcome of type I tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media active mucosal disease (wet ear) versus chronic otitis media inactive mucosal disease (dry ear). Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;69(4):500-3. PMID: 29238681 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-017-1233-z
6. Aggarwal SK, Kumar S, Dev R. Comparative study of tympanoplasty and its outcome in various age groups using the middle ear risk index scale. Indian J Otol. 2020;26(1):4-8. DOI: 10.4103/indianjotol.INDIANJOTOL_66_19
7. Huang J, Li Z, Wu K, Wang W. Long-term outcomes after performing tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy for active and inactive noncholesteatomatous chronic otitis media. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2018;80(5-6):277-83. PMID: 30130763 DOI: 10.1159/000491493
8. Tasleem M, Rahman A, Aslam M. Comparative study of outcome of endoscopic myringoplasty in active and inactive mucosal chronic otitis media patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;69(3):319-22. PMID: 28929062 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-017-1121-6
9. Dhanajkar PS, Keche PN, Ambulgekar VK, Gawarle SH, Gundale AR. Comparative study of outcome of type 1 tympanoplasty in dry and wet ear in tertiary care hospital. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;74(Suppl1):217-23. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-01985-9
10. Tiwari R, Singhal P, Verma N, Sehra R, Yadav R, Agarwal S, et al. Is It Wise to Wait for Ear to Become Dry in Indian Scenario? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;72(4):448-52. PMID: 33088773 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-01896-9
11. Lou Z, Li X. A comparative study of endoscopic cartilage myringoplasty used to treat wet and dry ears with mucosal-type chronic otitis media. J Laryngol Otol. 2020;134(9):773-8. PMID: 32753085 DOI: 10.1017/S0022215120001486
12. Gautam D, Pantha T. Outcome of myringoplasty in active and inactive ears in terms of graft uptake. Nepalese J ENT Head Neck Surg. 2017;8(2):11-4. Link
13. Shankar R, Virk R, Gupta K, Gupta A, Bal A, Bansal S. Evaluation and comparison of type I tympanoplasty efficacy and histopathological changes to the tympanic membrane in dry and wet ear: a prospective study. J Laryngol Otol. 2015;129(10):945-9. PMID: 26279256 DOI: 10.1017/S0022215115002091