Volume 30, Issue 2 (Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine-Summer 2023)                   Avicenna J Clin Med 2023, 30(2): 114-120 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Imani B, Banoueizadeh S, Zandi S, Khazaei S. Comparison of Two Methods of Simple and Continuous Plastic Subcutaneous Suture in Appendectomy Wound Healing. Avicenna J Clin Med 2023; 30 (2) :114-120
URL: http://sjh.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-2723-en.html
1- Department of Operating Room, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- Department of Operating Room, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , sara.banoei@gmail.com
3- Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Abstract:   (650 Views)
Background and Objective: Appendectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures with various clinical complications affecting wound healing. The type of skin closure is a critical surgical stage to prevent infection and dermal scarring. Therefore, administration of proper skin suturing can lead to complete wound healing and reduction of appendectomy-associated complications. In this regard, the present study was designed to compare the quality of the wound healing process and related complications in Simple Semi-Plastic (SSP) and Continuous Sub-Cuticular (CSC) dermal suturing procedures.
Materials and Methods: This triple-blind clinical trial study was conducted on 73 appendectomy patients randomly categorized as the cases with SSP (n=38) and CSC (n=35) suturing procedures. Demographic data, wound-associated characteristics (e.g., width of scar, color, odor, patency, necrotic tissue, wound warmth, granulation and epithelialization tissues, volume and color of wound secretion, and color of wound-surrounded tissues) were totally assessed using a pre-designed checklist. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) index was also used for assessing level of pain. All the collected data were applied on 2nd, 10th, and 30th days post-surgery. The obtained data was analyzed in SPSS software (version 23).
Results: According to the results of the present research, no significant differences were detected in the terms of demographic characteristics, wound-associated complications, healing-related factors, and changes of wound-surrounding tissues between the SSP and CSC groups (P>0.05). The width of scar was significantly higher on the 2nd and the 10th days after suturing in SSP group than CSC group (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Following appendectomy, thinner dermal scars along with better cosmetic outcomes can be obtained through the CSC technique than SSP.

 
Full-Text [PDF 1259 kb]   (278 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: General Surgery

References
1. Sharma A, Rajalingam V, Nageswaran H, Best L. A meta-analysis on continuous versus interrupted skin closure following appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2021;108(8):898-907. PMID: 34378014 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab251
2. Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg. 2002;137(7):799-804. PMID: 12093335 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.137.7.799
3. Mán E, Simonka Z, Varga A, Rárosi F, Lázár G. Impact of the Alvarado score on the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparing clinical judgment, Alvarado score, and a new modified score in suspected appendicitis: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(8):2398-405. PMID: 24705731 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3488-8
4. Sabbagh C, Siembida N, Dupont H, Diouf M, Schmit JL, Boddaert S, et al. The value of post-operative antibiotic therapy after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III study (ABAP study). Trials. 2020;21(1):451. PMID: 32487213 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04411-1
5. Hsu YL, Hsieh CE, Lin PY, Lin SL, Lin KH, Weng LC, et al. Postoperative incision scars and cosmetic satisfaction of living liver donors. Medicine. 2021;100(23):e26187. PMID: 34115002 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026187
6. Ghaderi H, Shamimi K, Moazzami F, Emami razavi SH, Aminian A, Jalali SM, et al. A new look at an old dogma: wound complications in two methods of skin closure in uncomplicated appendicitis. Tehran Univ Med J. 2010;68(1):54‐8.
7. Chanda A, Ruchti T, Unnikrishnan V. Computational modeling of wound suture: A review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2018;11:165-76. PMID: 29994368 DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2018.2804219
8. Luo W, Tao Y, Wang Y, Ouyang Z, Huang J, Long X. Comparing running vs interrupted sutures for skin closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2023;20(1):210-20. PMID: 35715955 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13863
9. Hopewell S, Boutron I, Moher D. CONSORT and its extensions for reporting clinical trials. Principles and practice of clinical trials. Springer, Cham; 2020.
10. Meng F, Andrea S, Cheng S, Wang Q, Huo R. Modified subcutaneous buried horizontal mattress suture compared with vertical buried mattress suture. Ann Plastic Surg. 2017;79(2):197-202. PMID: 28272151 DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001043
11. Varatharaj A, Ashford C, Steinlechner C. A Quick and Simple Knot-Free Subcuticular Suture. Ann Royal Coll Surgf Engl. 2007;89(5):532. DOI: 10.1308/003588407X202092d
12. Abdul-Hadi Safar A. Comparative study between interrupted mattress and continuous subcuticular skin closure in regarding post-appendectomy wound infection. Basrah J Surg. 2016;22(1):17-24. DOI: 10.33762/bsurg.2016.111180
13. Malekpour Alamdari N, Shahbazzadeh A, Gholizadeh B. Comparing subcuticular and transdermal appen-dectomy repairs: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Med Toxicol Forensic Med. 2018;2018:113-8. DOI: 10.22037/ijmtfm.v8i3(Summer).22909
14. Lu Y, Wang C, Lin L, Qin Q, Li Q. Complication rate of different wound closures after primary hip arthroplasty - A survey of 373 patients. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2017;11:15-8. PMID: 29552505 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2017.11.002
15. Okubo S, Gotohda N, Sugimoto M, Nomura S, Kobayashi S, Takahashi S, et al. Abdominal skin closure using subcuticular sutures prevents incisional surgical site infection in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Surgery. 2018;164(2):251-6. PMID: 29803560 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.002
16. Maged AM, Mohesen MN, Elhalwagy A, Abdelaal H, Almohamady M, Abdellatif AA, et al. Subcuticular interrupted versus continuous skin suturing in elective cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(24):4114-19. PMID: 29804486 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1481950
17. Samir M, Mahmoud MA, Azazy S, Tawfick A. Does the suturing technique (continuous versus interrupted) have an impact on the outcome of tubularized incised plate in hypospadias repair with adequate urethral plate? A prospective randomized study. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(4):519. PMID: 34006464 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.04.021
18. Shiryazdi S, Mirshamsi M, Jalilimanesh M, Taghavieh A, Hajiesmaeili M, Sehatbakhsh M. Closure of appendectomy wound comparing 2 methods: subcuticular and mattress suture. Iranian J Surg. 2008;15(4):41-6.
19. van de Kar AL, Koolbergen DR, van Avendonk JPH, van der Horst C. Comparison of wound closure techniques in median sternotomy scars in children: subcuticular suture versus Steri-Strip™ S. J Plastic Surg Hand Surg. 2019;53(3):161-6. PMID: 30688134 DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2019.1566737
20. Javadi S, Kasraianfard A, Ghaderzadeh P, Khorshidi H, Moein A, Makarchian H, et al. Comparison of Subcuticular and Interrupted Suturing Methods for Skin Closure After Appendectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Iranian Red Crescent Med J. 2018;20(1):e14469. DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.14469

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb