1. Celikten B, Uzuntas CF, Kursun S, Orhan AI, Tufenkci P, Orhan K, et al. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15(1):32-6. PMID: 25887521 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-015-0019-5
2. Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal files by using cone-beam computed tomography. Indian J Dent Res. 2016;27(1):37-41. PMID: 27054859 DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.179812
3. Mittal A, Dadu S, Singh NS, Singh S, Gupta B, Abraham A, et al. Comparative assessment of canal transportation and centering ability of reciproc and one shape file systems using CBCT-an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(4):ZC31-4. PMID: 28571257 DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24257.9660
4. Aminsobhani M, Ghorbanzadeh A, Dehghan S, Niasar AN, Kharazifard MJ. A comparison of canal preparations by Mtwo and RaCe rotary files using full sequence versus one rotary file techniques; a cone-beam computed tomography analysis. Saudi Endod J. 2014;4(2):70-6. DOI: 10.4103/1658-5984.132722
5. Moazzami F, Khojastepour L, Nabavizadeh M, Seied Habashi M. Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation by neoniti and reciproc single-file systems. Iran Endod J. 2016;11(2):96-100. PMID: 27141215 DOI: 10.7508/iej.2016.02.004
6. Marzouk AM, Ghoneim AG. Computed tomographic evaluation of canal shape instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium systems. J Endod. 2013;39(7):906-9. PMID: 23791261 DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.023
7. Nabavizadeh M, Abbaszadegan A, Khojastepour L, Amirhosseini M, Kiani E. A comparison of apical transportation in severely curved canals induced by reciproc and BioRaCe systems. Iran Endod J. 2014;9(2):117-22. PMID: 24688580
8. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004;30(8):559-67. PMID: 15273636
9. Arora A, Taneja S, Kumar M. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of different rotary NiTi instruments in curved canals using CBCT. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(1):35-9. PMID: 24554858 DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.124127
10. Saber S, Nagy M, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of Wave one, reciproc and one shape single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2015;48(1):109-14. PMID: 24673737 DOI: 10.1111/iej.12289
11. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Sousa-Neto MD, Pécora JD. Method for determination of root curvature radius using cone-beam computed tomography images. Braz Dent J. 2008;19(2):114-8. PMID: 18568224
12. You SY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Lee W. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod. 2010;36(12):1991-4. PMID: 21092819 DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.040
13. Nazari Moghadam K, Shahab S, Rostami G. Canal transportation and centering ability of twisted file and reciproc: a cone-beam computed tomography assessment. Iran Endod J. 2014;9(3):174-9. PMID: 25031589
14. Dhingra A, Ruhal N, Miglani A. Evaluation of single file systems reciproc, one shape, and wave one using cone beam computed tomography–an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(4):ZC30-4. PMID: 26023639 DOI: 10.7860/ JCDR/2015/12112.5803