Volume 29, Issue 1 (Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine-Spring 2022)                   Avicenna J Clin Med 2022, 29(1): 34-40 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rezaei B, Haresabadi F, Baghban K. Study and Comparison of Formant Characteristics of Persian Vowels in 4-7-year-old Children Using Cochlear Implants and Those Using Hearing Aids. Avicenna J Clin Med 2022; 29 (1) :34-40
URL: http://sjh.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-2320-en.html
1- Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , rezaeibahareh@yahoo.com
2- Department of Speech Therapy, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Abstract:   (1220 Views)
Background and Objective: One of the most important physical properties of vowels is their formant structure. One of the most obvious speech errors in hearing-impaired children is vowel errors. The present study aimed to determine and compare the formant structure of Persian vowels in deaf and cochlear implant children in the age range of 4-7 years.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was performed on 21 children with serious hearing impairment and 17 children with cochlear implants in the age range of 4-7 years. After considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the vowel production test was administered. The first and second formant of each of the six vowels were obtained separately by Praat software and compared between the two groups.
Results: There was a significant difference between deaf children and those with cochlear implants in the mean of the first and second formant of the /o/, as well as the mean of the first formant of the /i /, /a/, and /e / (P<0.05). Other vowel formants of the /æ/ and /u/ displayed no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).
Conclusion: As evidenced by the results of this study, the first formant of Persian language vowels related to tongue height was different in the two groups. It signifies that the vowels in cochlear implant children are closer to normal, compared to those in hearing-impaired children with hearing aids.
Full-Text [PDF 758 kb]   (480 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Speech Therapy

1. Shojaei E, Jafari Z, Gholami M. Effect of early intervention on language development in hearing-impaired children. iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;28(84):13-21. [PubMed]
2. Higgins C, Hodge M. Vowel area and intelligibility in children with and without dysartthria. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2002;10(4):271-7.
3. McCaffrey Morrison H. The locus equation as an index of coarticulation in syllables produced by speakers with profound hearing loss. Clin Linguist Phon. 2008;22(9):726-40. [DOI] [PubMed]
4. Monsen RB, Shaughnessy DH. Improvement in vowel articulation of deaf children. J Commun Disord. 1978;11(5):417-24. [DOI] [PubMed]
5. Seifert E, Oswald M, Bruns U, Vischer M, Kompis M, Haeusler R. Changes of voice and articulation in children with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2002;66(2):115-23. [DOI] [PubMed]
6. Hocevar Boltezar I, Boltezar M, Zargi M. The influence of cochlear implantation on vowel articulation. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2008;120(7-8):228-33. [DOI] [PubMed]
7. Danaher E, Pickett J. Some masking effects produced by low frequency vowel formants in persons with sensorneural hearing loss. J Speech Hea Res. 1975;18(2):261-71. [DOI]
8. Poissant SF, Peters KA, Robb MP. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of speech production in pediatric cochlear implant users. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;70(7):1195-203. [DOI] [PubMed]
9. McCaffrey HA, Sussman HM. An investigation of vowel organization in speakers with severe and profound hearing loss. J speech Hear Res. 1994;37(4):938-51. [DOI] [PubMed]
10. Bahrami A, Pourgharib J, Torabinejad F, Kamali M, Salehi F. The Persian vowel formant structure of students with normal, moderate and severe hearing loss aged 15-18 years in Esfahan. J Rehabil Sci. 2007;3(2):77-84. [ in persian]. [DOI]
11. Zamani P, Daneshmandan N, Salehi A, Rahgozar M. Coparison of persian simple vowels production in cochlear implanted children based on implation age. J Rehab. 2008;9(2):59-65. [in persian]
12. Zamani P, Rahmanirasa A, Weisi F, Valadbeigi A, Farahani F, Rezaei M. Vowel production in persian deaf children with cochlear implant: is the age of implantation an important factor?. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;66(4):407-13. [DOI] [PubMed]
13. Jafari N, Yadegari F, Jalaie S. Acoustic analysis of persian vowels in cochlear implant users: a comparison with hearing-impaired children using hearing aid and normal-hearing children. J Voice. 2016;30(6):1-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
14. Jafari N, Drinnan M, Mohamadi R, Yadegari F, Nourbakhsh M, Torabinezhad F. A comparison of persian vowel production in hearing-impaired children using a cochlear implant and normal-hearing children. J Voice. 2016;30(3):340-4. [DOI] [PubMed]
15. Baudonck N, Van Lierde K, Dhooge I, Corthals P. A comparison of vowel productions in prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants, severe hearing-impaired children using conventional hearing aids and normal-hearing children. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63(3):154-60. [DOI] [PubMed]
16. Horga D, Liker M. Voice and pronunciation of cochlear implant speakers. Clin Linguist Phon. 2006;20(2-3):211-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
17. Geers AE, Nicholas JG, Sedey AL. Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation. Ear Hear. 2003;24(1):46-58. [DOI] [PubMed]
18. Nicolaidis K, Sfakianaki A. Acoustic characteristics of vowels produced by Greek intelligible speakers with profound hearing impairment I: Examination of vowel space. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2016;18(4):378-87. [DOI] [PubMed]
19. Van Lierde KM, Vinck BM, Baudonck N, De Vel E, Dhooge I. Comparison of the overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance, and voice characteristics between children using cochlear implants and those using bilateral hearing aids: a pilot study. Int J Audiol. 2005;44(8):452-65. [DOI] [PubMed]
20. Uchanski RM, Geers AE. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates. Ear Hear. 2003;24(1):90-105. [DOI] [PubMed]
21. Sarayani M, Poursadegh A, Mohamadi R. Persian vowel production in hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants: the influence of the implantation age. Func Disabil J. 2021;4(1):37-37. [DOI]
22. Campisi P, Low AJ, Papsin BC, Mount RJ, Harrison RV. Multidimensional voice program analysis in profoundly deaf children: quantifying frequency and amplitude control. Percept Mot Skills. 2006;103(1):40-50. [DOI] [PubMed]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb