Volume 30, Issue 3 (Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine-Autumn 2023)                   Avicenna J Clin Med 2023, 30(3): 149-156 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Maghsoudlourad A, Kazeminia M, Rasooli M. Evaluation of the Canal Transportation by OneShape and Neolix Rotary Systems in the Mesial Root of Mandibular First Molars by Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Avicenna J Clin Med 2023; 30 (3) :149-156
URL: http://sjh.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-2808-en.html
1- Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
2- Department of Radiology, School of Dentistry, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
3- Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , rasoolimaryam93@gmail.com
Abstract:   (487 Views)
Background and Objective: One of the most important stages of root canal treatment is the correct and complete preparation of the root canal. This study aimed to compare the amount of canal transportation in two nickel titanium files, OneShape and Neolix.
Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, 30 extracted mandibular first molar teeth with 25-35-degree curvature were selected for periodontal reasons and randomly divided into two groups (n=15 each). A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was obtained from the teeth before the intervention. Followingly, the teeth of each group were prepared by the desired file (OneShape and Neolix) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Another CBCT scan was obtained from the teeth at the same angle. The amount of transportation was analyzed from the mesiodistal aspect at two distances of 3 and 9 mm from the apex. The preparation time of each tooth was also recorded by a chronometer. Data were analyzed by independent t-tests (α=0.05).
Results: The mean transport at a distance of 3 mm from the apex in the OneShape and Neolix groups was 0.19 and 0.1 mm, respectively. The mean transport at a distance of 9 mm from the apex was 0.2 and 0.1 mm in the OneShape and Neolix groups, respectively. Statistically, there was no significant difference in the amount of transportation between the two groups at the distance of 3 mm (P=0.055) and 9 mm (P=0.39). The mean preparation time was longer in the OneShape group than in the Neolix one; however, it did not show a statistically significant difference (P=0.73).

Conclusion: Both Neolix and OneShape files can maintain the curvature of the canal and are suitable for curved canals in terms of shaping ability.

Full-Text [PDF 919 kb]   (200 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Endodontics

1. Dhingra A, Ruhal N, Miglani A. Evaluation of single file systems reciproc, oneshape, and waveone using cone beam computed tomography -an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(4):30-4. PMID: 26023639 DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12112.5803
2. Forghani M, Hezarjaribi M, Teimouri H. Comparison of the shaping characteristics of Neolix and Protaper Universal systems in preparation of severely-curved simulated canals. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(4):556-9. PMID: 28469822 DOI: 10.4317/jced.53476
3. Bhondwe DS, Mahajan DV, Roh D. systems: Simple approach to root canal. Int J Cur Resh. 2016;8 (11):41165-8.
4. Gupta R, Dhingra A, Aggarwal N, Yadav V. A new approach to single file endodontics: Neoniti rotary file system. Int J Adv Case Rep. 2015;2(16):1030-32.
5. Kirchhoff AL, Chu R, Mello I, Garzon AD, dos Santos M, Cunha RS. Glide path management with single- and multiple-instrument rotary systems in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2015;41(11):1880-3. PMID: 26395910 DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.07.014
6. Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988;14(7):346-51. PMID: 3251996 DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(88)80196-1
7. Bürklein S, Benten S, Schäfer E. Shaping ability of different single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2013;46(6):590-7. PMID: 23240965 DOI: 10.1111/iej.12037
8. Gavini G, Santos MD, Caldeira CL, Machado MEL, Freire LG, Iglecias EF, et al. Nickel-titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32(suppl 1):e67. PMID: 30365608 DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0067
9. Setzer FC, Kwon T-K, Karabucak B. Comparison of apical transportation between two rotary file systems and two hybrid rotary instrumentation sequences. J Endod. 2010;36(7):1226-9. PMID: 20630304 DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.011
10. Dhingra A, Kochar R, Banerjee S, Srivastava P. Comparative evaluation of the canal curvature modifications after instrumentation with One Shape rotary and Wave One reciprocating files. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(2):138-41. PMID: 24778509 DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.128049
11. Moazzami F, Khojastepour L, Nabavizadeh M, Habashi MS. Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation by Neoniti and reciproc single-file systems. Iranian Endod J. 2016;11(2):96. PMID: 27141215 DOI: 10.7508/iej.2016.02.004
12. Jain D, Medha A, Patil N, Kadam N, Yadav V, Jagadale H. Shaping ability of the fifth generation ni-ti rotary systems for root canal preparation in curved root canals using cone-beam computed tomographic: an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(Suppl 1):57-61. PMID: 26225107
13. Gergi R, Arbab-Chirani R, Osta N, Naaman A. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2014;40(8):1223-7. PMID: 25069937 DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.039
14. Gambill JM, Alder M, Carlos E. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod. 1996;22(7):369-75. PMID: 8935064 DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80221-4
15. El Batouty KM, Elmallah WE. Comparison of canal transportation and changes in canal curvature of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2011;37(9):1290-2. PMID: 21846551 DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.024
16. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004;30(8):559-67. PMID: 15273636 DOI: 10.1097/01.don.0000129039.59003.9d
17. Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Development and sequelae of canal transportation. Endod Topics. 2006;15(1):75-90. DOI:10.1111/j.1601-1546.2009.00236.x
18. Wu M-K, Fan B, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod. 2000;26(4):210-6. PMID: 11199720 DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200004000-00003
19. Hoppe CB, Böttcher DE, Justo AM, Só MVR, Grecca FS. Comparison of curved root canals preparation using reciprocating, continuous and an association of motions. Scanning. 2016;38(5):462-8. PMID: 26750106 DOI: 10.1002/sca.21297
20. Berutti E, Fedon G. Thickness of cementum/dentin in mesial roots of mandibular first molars. J Endod. 1992;18(11):545-8. PMID: 1298791 DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81211-2
21. Park H. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;91(6):715-8. PMID: 11402288 DOI: 10.1067/moe.2001.114159
22. Versümer J, Hülsmann M, Schäfers F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using ProFile. 04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni–Ti instruments. Int Endod J. 2002;35(1):37-46. PMID: 11853237 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00454.x
23. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PM. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics. 2005;10(1):30-76. DOI:10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x
24. Madani Z, Soleymani A, Bagheri T, Moudi E, Bijani A, Rakhshan V. Transportation and centering ability of Neoniti and ProTaper instruments; A CBCT assessment. Iranian Endod J. 2017;12(1):43. PMID: 28179923 DOI: 10.22037/iej.2017.09
25. Nabeshima CK, Caballero-Flores H, Cai S, Aranguren J, Britto MLB, de Lima Machado ME. Bacterial removal promoted by 2 single-file systems: Wave one and one shape. J Endod. 2014;40(12):1995-8. PMID: 25149120 DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.024
26. Saber S, Nagy M, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2015;48(1):109-14. PMID: 24673737 DOI: 10.1111/iej.12289
27. Mittal A, Dadu S, Singh NS, Singh S, Gupta B, Abraham A, et al. Comparative Assessment of canal transportation and centering ability of reciproc and one shape file systems using cbct-an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(4):31-4. PMID: 28571257 DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24257.9660

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb