Volume 30, Issue 4 (Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine-Winter 2024)                   Avicenna J Clin Med 2024, 30(4): 240-247 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Yavari A, Sarhady M, Weisi F. Comparison of Oral Diadochokinesis in Two- and Three-Syllable Structures Consisting of Consonants and Vowel /a/ with Two- and Three-Syllable Structures Consisting of Consonants and Vowel /u/ in 7-9-Year-Old Children of Kermanshah, Iran. Avicenna J Clin Med 2024; 30 (4) :240-247
URL: http://sjh.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-2871-en.html
1- Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
2- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
3- Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Abstract:   (351 Views)
Background and Objective: Diadochokinesis tasks, as a traditional component of speech-motor assessment, are an indicator of the evaluation of oral motor skills. This study aimed to help determine a criterion for the evaluation of the speed of consecutive movements by determination of diadochokinesis in normal children aged 7 to 9 years. Moreover, by creating syllabic assignments, consisting of closed and open vowels, it was possible to compare the speed of production in reciprocal movement conditions.
Materials and Methods: The current descriptive-analytical study used a cross-sectional design. It was conducted on 210 primary school students in three age groups of 7, 8, and 9 years old in Kermanshah City, Iran, who were randomly selected. Students had to repeat two-syllable structures 15 times and three-syllable structures 10 times. The structures consisted of consonants and vowels/a/ and /u/ to determine their durations.
Results: The production speed of the two-syllable structures /pata/ and /paka/ was significantly higher, compared to that of /putu/ and /puku/, respectively (P=0.002). However, in the two-syllable structures /taka/ and /tuku/ (P=0.09) and trisyllable structures /pataka/ and /putuku/ (P=0.11), the difference of the mean diadocokinesis was not significant. Therefore, the vowel /a/ increased the ability of diadochokinesis in some syllabic combinations but had no effect on some other combinations.
Conclusion: With the increase of age, the ability to produce two- and three-syllable structures quickly and accurately increases. Usage of the vowel /a/, compared to the vowel /u/ in some syllabic combinations increased the speed of diadochokinesis but had no effect in some syllabic combinations
Full-Text [PDF 1227 kb]   (109 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Speech Therapy

References
1. Jothi S, Amritha M. Comparison of diadochokinetic rate between Malayalam and Tamil native speakers. International Journal of Research and Review. 2019;6(5):144-8.
2. Lowit A, Marchetti A, Corson S, Kuschmann A. Rhythmic performance in hypokinetic dysarthria: Relationship between reading, spontaneous speech and diadochokinetic tasks. J Commun Disord. 2018;72:26-39. PMID: 29471176 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.02.005
3. Nicolosi L, Harryman E, Kresheck J. Terminology of communication disorders: Speech-language-hearing. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2004.
4. Rozenstoks K, Novotny M, Horakova D, Rusz J. Automated assessment of oral diadochokinesis in multiple sclerosis using a neural network approach: Effect of different syllable repetition paradigms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2019;28(1):32-41. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2943064
5. Wang YT, Kent RD, Duffy JR, Thomas JE, Weismer G. Alternating motion rate as an index of speech motor disorder in traumatic brain injury. Clin Linguist Phon. 2004;18(1):57-84. PMID: 15053268 DOI: 10.1080/02699200310001596160
6. Pierce JE, Cotton S, Perry A. Alternating and sequential motion rates in older adults. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013;48(3):257-64. PMID: 23650883 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12001
7. Fletcher SG. Time-by-count measurement of diado-chokinetic syllable rate. J Speech Hear Res. 1972;15(4):763-70. PMID: 4652397 DOI: 10.1044/jshr.1504.763
8. Prathanee B, Thanaviratananich S, Pongjanyakul A. Oral diadochokinetic rates for normal Thai children. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2003;38(4):417-28. PMID: 14578054 DOI: 10.1080/1368282031000154042
9. Zamani P, Mousavi SM, Tahmasebi N, Sharafeh M, Nurmohammadi F. Comparison between Tri-syllabic words and non-words repetitive articulatory rate (oral diadochokinesis) in 4-6 year-old Persian speaking children. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2016;9(6):96-102.
10. Tykalova T, Rusz J, Klempir J, Cmejla R, Ruzicka E. Distinct patterns of imprecise consonant articulation among Parkinson’s disease, progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy. Brain Lang. 2017;165:1-9. PMID: 27894006 DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.11.005
11. Ziegler W. Task-related factors in oral motor control: Speech and oral diadochokinesis in dysarthria and apraxia of speech. Brain Lang. 2002;80(3):556-75. PMID: 11896657 DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2614
12. Icht M, Ben-David BM. Oral-diadochokinetic rates for Hebrew-speaking school-age children: Real words vs. non-words repetition. Clin Linguist Phon. 2015;29(2):102-14. PMID: 25259403 DOI: 10.3109/02699206.2014.961650
13. Yavari A, Weisi F, Rezaei M, Rashedi V. Assessment of Diadochokinetic skills in 7 to 9-year-old students of primary schools in Kermanshah, Iran. Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences, 2013;8(7):1228-35. DOI: 10.22122/jrrs.v8i7.688
14. Lichun S. How to use “Cool Edit Pro 2.1” to measure L2 oral fluency. In2012 IEEE Symposium on Robotics and Applications (ISRA). IEEE. 2012:57-60. DOI: 10.1109/ISRA.2012.6219118
15. Fletcher SG. Method for utilizing oral movement and related events. Acoustical Society of America Journal. 2006;120(5):2413. DOI: 10.1121/1.2395155
16. Icht M, Ben-David BM. Oral-diadochokinesis rates across languages: English and Hebrew norms. J Commun Disord. 2014;48:27-37. PMID: 24630145 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.02.002
17. Modolo DJ, Berretin-Felix G, Genaro KF, Brasolotto AG. Oral and vocal fold diadochokinesis in children. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63(1):1-8. PMID: 20689303 DOI: 10.1159/000319728
18. Tobey EA, Geers AE, Brenner C, Altuna D, Gabbert G. Factors associated with development of speech production skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear. 2003;24(1 Suppl):36S-45S. PMID: 12612479 DOI: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000051688.48224.A6
19. Pigdon L, Willmott C, Reilly S, Conti-Ramsden G, Morgan AT. What predicts nonword repetition performance? Child Neuropsychol. 2020;26(4):518-33. DOI: 10.1080/09297049.20191674799 PMID: 31581884
20. Hulme C, Thomson N, Muir C, Lawrence A. Speech rate and the development of short-term memory span. Journal of experimental child psychology. 1984;38(2):241-53.
21. Kent RD, Forner LL. Speech segment durations in sentence recitations by children and adults. Journal of phonetics. 1980;8(2):157-68. DOI: 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31460-3

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb