Volume 31, Issue 4 (Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine-Winter 2025)                   Avicenna J Clin Med 2025, 31(4): 245-254 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zarei S, Baghban K, Tahamtan S, Yarmohammadi H, Pashaei Z, Sazmand S, et al . Investigation and Comparison of the Normative Nasalance Score in Normal Persian-Speaking Men and Women Aged 21-33. Avicenna J Clin Med 2025; 31 (4) :245-254
URL: http://sjh.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-3148-en.html
1- Student Research Committee, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , baghban.kowsar@gmail.com
3- Department of Biostatistics, School of Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Abstract:   (643 Views)
Background and Objective: Measuring the data of normative nasalance scores in the speech of normal people helps speech therapists obtain more accurate results regarding the condition of their clients. The present study aimed to investigate the normative nasalance score and the relationship between gender and nasalance in normal Persian-speaking people aged 21-33 and the influence of gender on it.
Materials and Methods: The present descriptive-analytical and non-experimental study, using convenience sampling, was conducted on 106 Persian-speaking, accent-less participants without production, amplification, sound, and hearing disorders (53 women and 53 men) aged 21-33 in 2024 in Hamadan, Iran. The mean normative nasalance scores were measured using the nasometer model ANDREA SN: 8538, the SNAP test, and readings of the Rainbow and Bahare’s Bag texts.
Results: The mean nasalance score in the syllable /ʃa/ was 14.30±4.41 for males and 12.21±4.18 for females, respectively. Moreover, the mean nasalance score in the carrier phrase focused on lingual alveolar consonants was 16.47±4.60 for males and 14.71±3.75 for females, in respective order. In general, the mean nasalance score was significantly higher for men compared to that for women. However, there was no significant difference between the mean nasalance scores of other speech contexts in men compared to women.
Conclusion: The mean scores of normative nasalance did not demonstrate a significant difference between males and females in most contextures. Additionally, obtaining normative nasalance scores in Persian-speaking men and women can be used as a baseline for assessing, diagnosing, and treating resonance disorders in the Persian language.
 
Full-Text [PDF 778 kb]   (218 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Speech Therapy

References
1. Böhme G. Sprach-, Sprech-, Stimm-und Schluckstörungen: Gustav Fischer Verlag Stuttgart; 1997.
2. Hirschberg J, Bók S, Juhász M, Trenovszki Z, Votisky P, Hirschberg A. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;70(5):785-98. PMID: 16246433 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.09.017
3. Wendler J. Lehrbuch der phoniatrie und pädaudiologie. Georg Thieme Verlag. 2005. DOI:10.1055/b-001-1063
4. Musapour M, Sadeghi S, Derakhshandeh F. Nasometry normative data for Persian normal girls and boys in Isfahan in two age groups of 7-14 and 14-20 years old. Sci J Rehabilita Med. 2018;7(4):1-10. DOI:10.22037/jrm.2018.111072.1739
5. Kummer AW. Cleft palate and craniofacia conditions: a comprehensive guide to clinical management. 4th edition. Jones & Bartlett Learning.2020. Link
6. Baghban K, Asadi M, Zarifian T, Derakhshandeh F. Temporal aspects of velopharyngeal coarticulation in persian-speaking adults with and without cleft palate. Iranian Rehabilitation J. 2024; 22 (3) :411-422. DOI:10.32598/irj.22.3.1468.1
7. Howard S, Lohmander A. cleft palate speech: assessment and intervention. 2 ed. John Wiley & Sons. 2011. p. 145. DOI:10.1002/9781118785065
8. Baghban K, Derakhshandeh F, Adibi A, Shati M, Khanlar F, Mostajeran F et al . The effects of intensive speech therapy on non-oral cleft speech characteristics and quality of life in children with cleft palate. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2021; 19 (3) :315-324. DOI: 10.32598/irj.19.3.24.5
9. Hamdan AL, Ziade G, Jabbour J, Khneizer G, Kutkut I. Nasalance scores in lebanese english-speaking adults using nasometric analysis. J Med Liban. 2015;63(4):203-208. PMID: 26821403
10. Baghban K, Torabinejad F, Moradi N, Biglarian A. A study on the temporal patterns of nasalization in 4-to-12 year-old Persians speaking cleft palate and their normal peers. J Res Rehabilita Sci. 2012;8(3):530-540. DOI:10.22122/jrrs.v8i3.657
11. Van Lierde K, Wuyts FL, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberge P. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(2):112-118. PMID: 11294538 DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_2001_038_0112_nvfnnr_2.0.co_2
12. Park M, Baek WS, Lee E, Koh KS, Kim B-k, Baek R. Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(2):173-177. PMID: 24211114 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.10.035
13. Marino VCdC, Cardoso VM, De Boer G, Dutka JdCR, Fabbron EMG, Bressmann T. Normative nasalance scores for middle-aged and elderly speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2018;70(2):82-89. PMID: 30041244 DOI:10.1159/000489334
14. El-Kassabi RM, Hassan S, Mesallam TA, Malki KH, Farahat M, Alfaris A. Standardization of nasalance scores in normal Saudi speakers. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2015;40(2):77-85. PMID: 24854781 DOI: 10.3109/14015439.2014.907339
15. Jafari Z, Alinezhad B. The Vowel space of Persian nasalized vowels. Lang Res. 2020;12(34):297-324. DOI: 10.22051/jlr.2018.21102.1567
16. Baghban K, Torabinejad F, Moradi N, Mardani N, Asadollahpour F. Investigation the effect of nasalance on the frequency formants of the vowel /a/ before and after the nasal consonant /m/ in children with cleft palate. J Paramedical Sci and Rehabilita. 2014;3(2):62-68. DOI: 10.22038/jpsr.2014.3336
17. Hashemi H, Jalilevand N, Ghorbani A, Kamali M. Nasalance scores in the speech of normal 3.5-6.5-years-old children, in Tehran, Iran. Aud Vestib Res. 2017;23(2):49-57. Link
18. Ghaemi H, Sobhani Rad D, Khodadoost M, Elyasi M, Mardani N. Detecting normal values of nasalance scores in 7-11-year-old boys. J Paramedical Sci Rehabilita. 2015;4(2):76-82. DOI:10.22038/jpsr.2015.4380
19. Ghelichi L, Amiri Y, Shoki, Jenabi MS, Khorasani B. Phonetic context and nasalance score in word level. Archi Rehabilita. 2005;6(2):43-49. Link
20. Ashtab F. Determining reliability and validity of SNAP test for evaluating speech nasality [M.Sc. Thesis]. Mashhad:Varastegan Institute for Medical Sciences. 2015
21. Razmju Z. Making Persian texts to assess speech in normal children aged 8-12 years nasality and determine the reliability and validity [M.Sc. Thesis]. Tehran University of medical Sciences; 2005: 84-93.
22. Memarian A, Ghorbani A, Torabi Nejad F, Keyhani MR. Designing a Farsi text for the assessment of adult voice features and determining its validity and reliability in measuring the fundamental frequency and intensity of speech. J Res Rehabilita Sci. 2008;4(2). DOI:10.22122/JRRS.V4I2.44
23. Fletcher S. Cleft palate speech assessment through oral-nasal acoustic measures. Communicative Disorders Related to Cleft Lip and Palate. 1989. Link
24. Bressmann T. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(4):423-433. PMID: 16001925 DOI: 10.1597/03-029.1
25. Sweeney T, Sell D, O'Regan M. Nasalance scores for normal-speaking Irish children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41(2):168-174. PMID: 14989687 DOI: 10.1597/02-094
26. Prathanee B, Thanaviratananich S, Pongjunyakul A, Rengpatanakij K. Nasalance scores for speech in normal Thai children. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003;37(6):351-355. PMID: 15328774 DOI: 10.1080/02844310310005892
27. Sarac ET, Kayikci MEK, Ozkan S. Nasality evaluation of Turkish phonemes in vowel-consonant combinations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75(7):894-898. PMID: 21612830 DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.03.031

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb