Yavarikia A. Comparison of Efficacy of Two Nonsurgical Methods , “Primary Immobilization” and ”Early Active Functional Treatment” in Management of Patients with Mild (Grade I&II) Ankle Sprin . Avicenna J Clin Med 2002; 8 (4) URL: http://sjh.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-797-en.html
The aim of this study was the comparison of efficacy of two nonsurgical
methods in management of patients with acute ligamentous injury (Sprain)
of ankle which are “Primary immobilization” and “Early active functional
treatment”.
This study consist of 200 patients with acute ankle sprain who referred to
emergency ward and clinic of orthopedics of Mobasher Kashani Hospital of
Hamadan. This was a clinical trial study. 100 patients were managed with
primary immobilization and the other 100 patients were treated with active
functional treatment. Information were gathered with a questionaire that
complete during a primary and later serial physical examinations. Datum
were analyzed manually and then for quantitative variables, t-test and for
gualitative variables, fisher exact test were performed.
Results of this study revealed that the mean time for return to normal
daily activities in patients with grade I of ankle sprain that managed with
“primary immobilization” was14.5 days Vs 14.1 days in patients that managed
with “early active functional treatment”. In addition , the mean time for
return to professional or athletic activities, in patients with grade I and II of
ankle sprain in two groups had not a significant difference. But the mean
time for return to normal daily activities in patients with grade II of ankle
sprain with “primary immobilizatin” and “early active functional treatment”
were 27.4 and 21.38 days respectively. In two groups there was no
difference in level of fuctional activity on 90 days after treatment.
Finally we could say that there was no difference between these two
methods in approaching the patients to their pre-injury level of activity.